Issue54

Title axiom support differs from what is described in the AIJ translator paper
Priority wish Status chatting
Superseder Nosy List jendrik, malte
Assigned To Keywords translator
Optional summary

Created on 2009-12-03.17:47:47 by malte, last changed by malte.

Messages
msg3355 (view) Author: malte Date: 2014-08-27.15:10:00
See issue458.
msg152 (view) Author: malte Date: 2009-12-03.17:47:47
The AIJ translator paper associates layers with axiom *rules*, not with axiom
*variables*. This is more general because it allows for non-binary derived
variables. (In our implementation's version, non-binary derived variables would
either be trivial, i.e. certain values could never be achieved, or they'd
violate the layering property in the AIJ translator paper.)

For people who directly generate FDR tasks rather than go through our
translator, we should either support the more general case, or at least properly
document the restriction of derived variables to the binary case.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-10-04 19:50:17maltesetkeyword: + translator
2014-08-27 15:10:00maltesetmessages: + msg3355
2009-12-03 17:47:47maltecreate