Author malte
Recipients erez, gabi, malte
Date 2011-01-17.13:17:31
We've already had several releases like that in the past, e.g. the 2004 IPC
version, or the JAIR paper version. But giving it a label like 1.0 indicates
some degree of "ready-to-use"  that it doesn't have due to a few major bugs and
other issues. For comparison, Silvia was always emphatic that people should
*not* use the IPC version of LAMA for experiments due to its bugs. Calling it
LAMA 1.0 would have sent a wrong message there.
Date User Action Args
2011-01-17 13:17:31maltesetmessageid: <>
2011-01-17 13:17:31maltesetrecipients: + malte, erez, gabi
2011-01-17 13:17:31maltelinkissue207 messages
2011-01-17 13:17:31maltecreate