Message5852

Author malte
Recipients andrew.coles, erez, florian, jendrik, malte, silvia
Date 2016-12-08.17:10:25
Content
Hi Andrew, you're not the first (or second, or third ;-)) one to be tripped up
by the new "optional summary" field. Pasting your comment as a change note:

=========

Jendrik - re the changes for v1 - is there a need to store the parent operator
at all?  A while back I stripped this out of a fork of FD, and when a goal state
was reached, derived what the operators must have been by looking at the
differences between states on the path to the goal.  This has a small
postprocessing cost, but saves memory.
History
Date User Action Args
2016-12-08 17:10:25maltesetmessageid: <1481213425.46.0.472335824854.issue213@unibas.ch>
2016-12-08 17:10:25maltesetrecipients: + malte, erez, andrew.coles, silvia, jendrik, florian
2016-12-08 17:10:25maltelinkissue213 messages
2016-12-08 17:10:25maltecreate