Author malte
Recipients jendrik, malte
Date 2016-12-12.23:35:08
I think the last point of the summary confounded two separate points, so I've
split it into two. (Working with non-contiguous memory is an advantage of deques
that we can get without changing anything about the rehashing. So there is an
easy change and a hard change. Either change can be individually beneficial in
terms of memory usage. I find it hard to predict what they would mean for
runtime, but the second change certainly sounds like it might incur a runtime
Date User Action Args
2016-12-12 23:35:08maltesetmessageid: <>
2016-12-12 23:35:08maltesetrecipients: + malte, jendrik
2016-12-12 23:35:08maltelinkissue690 messages
2016-12-12 23:35:08maltecreate