Author malte
Recipients florian, guillem, jendrik, malte, manuel, silvan
Date 2017-12-04.13:06:33
I'm done commenting on bitbucket. There are some issues to do with heuristic
caching and path-dependent heuristics that we should discuss (also with Salomé),
but I think we are ready for experiments either way.

I think the experiments should exercise all search algorithms that were changed
and both path-dependent heuristics ("regular" lmcount and synergy lmcount). If
we include lama-first, lama and seq-opt-bjolp, we have coverage of all
heuristics, I think. Choose whatever else makes sense to get coverage of all
search algorithms (e.g. something like EHC with the FF heuristic).
Date User Action Args
2017-12-04 13:06:34maltesetmessageid: <>
2017-12-04 13:06:34maltesetrecipients: + malte, jendrik, silvan, florian, manuel, guillem
2017-12-04 13:06:34maltelinkissue724 messages
2017-12-04 13:06:33maltecreate