Issue217

Title Scripts: Add option to Experiment class to directly start experiment
Priority wish Status resolved
Superseder Nosy List jendrik, malte, silvan
Assigned To jendrik Keywords
Optional summary

Created on 2011-02-24.12:58:16 by jendrik, last changed by jendrik.

Messages
msg1257 (view) Author: jendrik Date: 2011-03-04.21:11:19
I thought about this issue and I would say that it's better to keep building and 
starting of an experiment separate. The experiment.sh wrapper simplifies 
submitting the experiments and one only has to change into the experiment's 
directory if one wants to submit the experiment manually. Therefore I am setting 
this issue to resolved.
msg1244 (view) Author: malte Date: 2011-02-24.13:29:20
Even if there is an option to directly start experiments, I think we'd still
need a way to handle experiments that are not immediately started in a better way.

I thought about this a bit yesterday, and I think we could/should add some
path-guessing logic into the code. (That would be a separate issue, though.)
msg1243 (view) Author: jendrik Date: 2011-02-24.12:58:15
This eliminates the need for or is supposed to be a qsub wrapper.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-03-04 21:11:19jendriksetstatus: chatting -> resolved
messages: + msg1257
2011-02-24 13:29:20maltesetstatus: unread -> chatting
messages: + msg1244
2011-02-24 12:58:16jendrikcreate