Issue24

Title FDTech Landmark Implementation is Slow
Priority feature Status resolved
Superseder Nosy List erez, malte, silvia
Assigned To erez Keywords
Optional summary

Created on 2009-10-08.18:34:23 by erez, last changed by malte.

Messages
msg56 (view) Author: malte Date: 2009-10-09.19:19:47
Erez changed the implementation, and it is now much faster. We still need to do
proper timing, but since we need to do that for all heuristics, that's a
separate issue.
msg37 (view) Author: erez Date: 2009-10-08.18:34:23
The FDTech implementation of reached landmark storage is slower than LAMA's.
We compared using the lama heuristic (without preferred operators) using GBFS,
and got a slowdown of 2-3 times on logistics-00/14-1 (for example).

The implementation should be changed to contain a hash map from states to set of
reached landmarks. This will be done after Silvia integrates the different
landmark/LAMA branches.
History
Date User Action Args
2009-10-09 19:19:47maltesetstatus: deferred -> resolved
messages: + msg56
2009-10-09 01:01:11silviasetnosy: + silvia
2009-10-09 00:35:59maltesetnosy: + malte
2009-10-08 18:34:23erezcreate