...and they say which heuristic they talk about. (Previously there was no way to
figure this out.) It's still not ideal for heuristics that are assigned the name
"<missing>", but I agree we can consider this resolved.

I think this issue has been fixed since newer planner versions use a separate 
line for each heuristic and its estimate.

When using multiple heuristics, e.g. in alternation, the order of heuristics in
the report lines (e.g. best heuristic value 10/4/11) is not clear to the user.
According to Shahab Jabbari, it is apparently not the order in which the
heuristics are specified on the command line. Probably the heuristics are sorted
by memory address, which can vary from system to system or even run to run.

Having a predictable order and some information on what is what (e.g. using the
symbolic names or heuristic expressions from the command line) would be useful.