Issue 916: Support K,M,G suffixes for integer options in the code - Fast Downward issue tracker

Title	Support K,M,G suffixes for integer options in the code
Priority	wish	Status	resolved
Superseder		Nosy List	jendrik, malte
Assigned To	jendrik	Keywords
Optional summary

Created on 2019-06-04.09:06:14 by jendrik, last changed by jendrik.

Messages
msg8814 (view)	Author: jendrik	Date: 2019-06-05.16:08:38
We talked about this offline, I added a comment to the code and merged it.
msg8794 (view)	Author: jendrik	Date: 2019-06-04.09:45:13
I think the pull request will make it clearer: https://bitbucket.org/jendrikseipp/downward/pull-requests/134 Previously, we could not use "1M" in the code, only on the commandline.
msg8793 (view)	Author: malte	Date: 2019-06-04.09:12:04
I don't understand what you mean by this. Can you elaborate? Using the suffixes seems to work fine.
msg8792 (view)	Author: jendrik	Date: 2019-06-04.09:06:14
In issue886 we added support for K,M,G suffixes for integer options in commandline options. However, we forgot to allow using these suffixes in the code.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2019-06-05 16:08:38	jendrik	set	status: reviewing -> resolved messages: + msg8814
2019-06-04 09:45:23	jendrik	set	status: chatting -> reviewing assignedto: jendrik
2019-06-04 09:45:13	jendrik	set	messages: + msg8794
2019-06-04 09:12:04	malte	set	status: unread -> chatting messages: + msg8793
2019-06-04 09:06:14	jendrik	create