Issue955

Title split up tox environments and style tests
Priority wish Status resolved
Superseder Nosy List florian, jendrik, malte, silvan
Assigned To jendrik Keywords
Optional summary

Created on 2019-12-20.12:50:34 by jendrik, last changed by jendrik.

Messages
msg9171 (view) Author: jendrik Date: 2020-01-17.13:18:05
This is now merged.
msg9170 (view) Author: jendrik Date: 2020-01-17.12:23:06
Thanks! Yes, the run-clang-tidy.py comes bundled with clang-tidy. I searched for a different name for the new file, but the old one was just to good :-)
msg9168 (view) Author: florian Date: 2020-01-17.12:19:34
I also don't use this code and also don't know anything about it. I tried looking at the individual commits as Jendrik suggested. Looks like one file was removed in favor of a file that comes with clang-tidy (?) but then later another file was added with the same name as the removed file but a different content. It's hard to see in the diff but as long as it works I have no objections to merging this.
msg9165 (view) Author: jendrik Date: 2020-01-16.19:29:15
Florian, could you have a look at the code, please? The bulk of the diff stems from removing one file and putting code from another file in its place. It may be easiest to inspect the individual commits.
msg9164 (view) Author: malte Date: 2020-01-16.18:29:02
I don't really use this code and know nothing about it. Silvan wrote it's perhaps mainly moved code, but that doesn't seem to match the numbers in the diff (+132 lines, -431 lines). If Silvan doesn't want to sign off on the code, I suggest you ask Florian.
msg9163 (view) Author: jendrik Date: 2020-01-16.14:01:38
Malte, I also think that this doesn't necessarily need a review. Do you agree, or should I ask someone else for a review?
msg9157 (view) Author: silvan Date: 2020-01-16.12:19:48
Sorry, I just needed to write an additional review for another ICAPS submission. I also wanted to read the reading group paper and urgently need to work on the paper for IJCAI. I don't think I can find the time to review this before the IJCAI deadline, because the PR is not small :-) 

Since I assume that this is pure refactoring and you only moved around code, I don't think we necessarily need a review here. The two new separate tests you extracted from the previous larger test look fine to me.
msg9156 (view) Author: jendrik Date: 2020-01-16.11:27:52
I'd like to finish this issue before working on issue958. Silvan, could you have a quick look at the patch, please?
msg9134 (view) Author: jendrik Date: 2019-12-24.12:43:25
Silvan, could you review the patch, please?
msg9133 (view) Author: jendrik Date: 2019-12-21.18:12:42
I prepared a pull request for this at https://bitbucket.org/jendrikseipp/downward/pull-requests/146 .
msg9132 (view) Author: jendrik Date: 2019-12-20.12:50:34
I'd like to separate the valgrind and clang-tidy tests into separate tox environments because they have additional non-Python dependencies and also run longer than most of our other tests.
History
Date User Action Args
2020-01-17 13:18:05jendriksetstatus: reviewing -> resolved
messages: + msg9171
2020-01-17 12:23:06jendriksetmessages: + msg9170
2020-01-17 12:19:34floriansetmessages: + msg9168
2020-01-16 19:29:15jendriksetnosy: + florian
messages: + msg9165
2020-01-16 18:29:02maltesetmessages: + msg9164
2020-01-16 14:01:38jendriksetmessages: + msg9163
2020-01-16 12:19:48silvansetmessages: + msg9157
2020-01-16 11:27:52jendriksetmessages: + msg9156
2019-12-24 12:43:25jendriksetmessages: + msg9134
2019-12-23 22:35:50silvansetnosy: + silvan
2019-12-21 18:12:42jendriksetstatus: unread -> reviewing
messages: + msg9133
2019-12-20 12:50:34jendrikcreate